Even if I'd say even that people are allowed to be into, even if I find it gross and it should be hidden away in the most remote parts of the internet.Īnonymous 04/25/22(Mon)11:38:39 No. Lolisho is by its very idea much more shocking and will likely have a more impactful effect on children than like, seeing some twink who looks ambiguously old enough pound a bigger guy will have on any teenager (antis are basically just adding fuel to the fire in that regard, creating outrage rather than teaching younger folks that fiction is maleable and you shouldn't focus on things you dislike). But calling it shota is just a false equivalency. There's an argument to be made about mainstream sexualizing teens, but drawn parody porn is too niche for it to matter as much).
Wether it matters if a fictionnal character is underage is a debate that can be had (and honestly, I don't really think it does. The rules of the board themselves define shota as prepubescent kids. I keep seeing people calling 'shota' anything that involves a character who's canonically uderage.
